IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijoass/v5y2015i5p266-281id2732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficacy of Input-Based Instruction in Promoting the Acquisition of English Embedded Questions

Author

Listed:
  • Manoochehr Jafarigohar
  • Fatemeh Hemmati
  • Hassan Soleimani
  • Mehri Jalali

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare the possible effects of three types of input-based instruction on the acquisition of English “WH” embedded questions. The impact of these instructions was investigated on Van Patten’s Sentence Location Principle. Participants were 105 university students in four intact classes who were randomly assigned to four conditions: processing instruction (PI), textual input enhancement (TE), consciousness-raising (C-R), and control. A quasi-experimental design with a pretest-treatment-posttest sequence was used and the participants’ acquisition of the target structure was measured using a knowledge test including interpretation and production tasks at sentence level. The results showed that both PI and C-R instructions were effective in improving the learners’ interpretation and production of the embedded questions and their effect was durable over a one month period; however, PI was superior to other instructions. Results also revealed that TE was only effective in improving interpretation of the target structure and did not have any positive impact on its production. This study provides further understanding of the effectiveness of providing learners with opportunities to focus on form and meaning in their L2.

Suggested Citation

  • Manoochehr Jafarigohar & Fatemeh Hemmati & Hassan Soleimani & Mehri Jalali, 2015. "The Efficacy of Input-Based Instruction in Promoting the Acquisition of English Embedded Questions," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(5), pages 266-281.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ijoass:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:266-281:id:2732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5007/article/view/2732/4157
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ijoass:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:266-281:id:2732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5007/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.