IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijoass/v2y2012i1p34-43id2158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis in the Evaluation of the Performance of Two Binary Diagnostic Tests of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Author

Listed:
  • Okeh UM
  • Ogah IE
  • Okeh US
  • Agwu A

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy measures of the random glucose test and the 50-g glucose challenge test as screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Research Design And Methods: In this prospective cohort study, pregnant women without preexisting diabetes in two perinatal centers in the Ebonyi State underwent a random glucose test and a 50-g glucose challenge test between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. If one of the screening tests exceeded predefined threshold values, the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed within 1 week. Furthermore, the OGTT was performed in a random sample of women in whom both screening tests were normal. GDM was considered present when the OGTT (reference test) exceeded predefined threshold values. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the two screening tests. The results were corrected for verification bias. Results: We included 1,301 women. The OGTT was performed in 322 women. After correction for verification bias, the random glucose test showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.69 (95% CI 0.61– 0.78), whereas the glucose challenge test had an area under the curve of 0.88 (0.83– 0.93). There was a significant difference in area under the curve of the two tests of 0.19 (0.11– 0.27) in favor of the 50-g glucose challenge test. Conclusions: In screening for GDM, the 50-g glucose challenge test is more useful than the random glucose test.

Suggested Citation

  • Okeh UM & Ogah IE & Okeh US & Agwu A, 2012. "The use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis in the Evaluation of the Performance of Two Binary Diagnostic Tests of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 2(1), pages 34-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ijoass:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:34-43:id:2158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5007/article/view/2158/3413
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ijoass:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:34-43:id:2158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5007/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.