IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ajoerj/v3y2013i10p1277-1290id3613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Directors’ View on Exemption from Statutory Audit

Author

Listed:
  • Rohana OTHMAN
  • Zubaidah ZAINAL ABIDIN
  • Nagathretnam THIRUMANICKAM

Abstract

Fundamentally, an audit is important to inform shareholders about the well-being of the company’s finances as it helps shareholders as well as stakeholders to make informed decisions based on the company’s performance. The current trend is however to exempt small companies from the annual audit requirement. Many studies in the United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore have addressed the issue of audit exemption for small companies. Over the years, these countries and several others have exempted small companies from the annual audit requirement. In Malaysia, it is a statutory requirement for all companies registered with the Companies Commission of Malaysia to have their annual accounts audited. However this statutory requirement is currently being reviewed to allow for an audit exemption for small companies. This study therefore explores factors that may be associated with the take-up level of audit exemption among small medium enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia namely; value of audit, financing strategy, future plans, size of firms, director’s qualification, dependent users and audit cost. Results indicate that all six factors have a significant relationship with the take-up level of audit exemption with the exception of director’s qualification. The majority of SMEs in this study chose to continue with statutory audit even if they are not legally required to do so, showing that there is a low take-up level of audit exemption among SMEs. The results from this study provide useful information for policy makers, auditors and directors of small companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohana OTHMAN & Zubaidah ZAINAL ABIDIN & Nagathretnam THIRUMANICKAM, 2013. "Directors’ View on Exemption from Statutory Audit," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(10), pages 1277-1290.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ajoerj:v:3:y:2013:i:10:p:1277-1290:id:3613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5004/article/view/3613/5725
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ajoerj:v:3:y:2013:i:10:p:1277-1290:id:3613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5004/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.