IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v9y2019i9p1043-1066id1857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rest Breaks Arrange Based on Empirical Studies of Productivity in Manufacturing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Dong
  • Qiguo Gong
  • Hui Wang
  • Siyuan Yi
  • Yue Cai

Abstract

This paper investigates how worker productivity differs in each consecutive work period based on tests conducted on a manufacturing company. We first employed a two-dimension fixed effect model to unbalanced panel data with 6,117,317 records which contain 102 employees and 1680 workdays. We also found that worker productivity between two adjacent rest breaks shows a U-shaped trend. This finding supplements the previous researches about interruption events, which only explored the effect of interruption after its occurrence. Based on our empirical findings, to obtain the lowest production system variability, a mathematical model which aims to optimally configure work and break scheduling of a production line is then presented. The optimal schedule is that one worker either begins their work when another worker from the same workstation starts their break immediately or has worked for a half of a completed work and break period. Our analysis combines empirical studies and model analysis to improve the operations management researches and practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Dong & Qiguo Gong & Hui Wang & Siyuan Yi & Yue Cai, 2019. "Rest Breaks Arrange Based on Empirical Studies of Productivity in Manufacturing Industry," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(9), pages 1043-1066.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:9:y:2019:i:9:p:1043-1066:id:1857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1857/2867
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1857/7293
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:9:y:2019:i:9:p:1043-1066:id:1857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.