IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v9y2019i10p1136-1146id1867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Islamic Banks Less Efficient than other Banks? Evidence from Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Md Reiazul Haque
  • Md Nurul Islam Sohel

Abstract

Considering the recent shrinkage in Islamic banks’ profitability in Bangladesh, this study investigated whether these banks are less efficient than the conventional and mixed banks. Using 250 firm-year observations from 38 private commercial banks for the years from 2011 to 2017 and estimating operational efficiency through the Data Envelopment and Stochastic Frontier Analyses, we found robust evidence that Islamic banks are less efficient than the conventional and mixed banks. In additional analysis, it was found that the lower efficiency of Islamic banks was driven by their non-investment income. A significant negative shift in Islamic banks’ efficiency was evident in the most recent years compared to the earliest periods in our sample window. These findings helped us explain why the relative profitability of Islamic banks has declined recently. We suggest that Islamic banks’ management pay more attention to their portfolio of non-investment products and services in order to remain competitive in the fast-growing banking landscape in Bangladesh.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Reiazul Haque & Md Nurul Islam Sohel, 2019. "Are Islamic Banks Less Efficient than other Banks? Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(10), pages 1136-1146.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:9:y:2019:i:10:p:1136-1146:id:1867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1867/2883
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1867/4245
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:9:y:2019:i:10:p:1136-1146:id:1867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.