IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v8y2018i3p366-377id1680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Peg and F_Score on Stock Return by Valued Investment Portfolios: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Hoa Thi Tuyet Le
  • Vinh Tuan Tran
  • Nhan Thi Pham Nguyen
  • Nam Sy Ngo
  • Toan Luu Duc Huynh

Abstract

The study determines the effects of the PEG valuation factor (P/E combined growth rate) and the F_score on the calculation of the impacts on the return on the portfolio of empirically value stocks at 250 non-financial firms listed on the Vietnam’s stock market from 2006 to 2017. The authors used system-GMM estimation method, quantile regression and t-test estimation to confirm the research hypotheses made by the authors. The results show that firms with low PEG and high F_score will yield higher return from empirical tests in the Vietnamese market, which is consistent with previous theories. Firms with increasing F_score will earn higher stock return and the portfolio of PEG-valued stocks will outperform others in the market. The authors used system-GMM estimation method to deal with the defects of the model and used quantile regression analysis to determine the effect level of the rate of return on each quantile in the Vietnamese stock market.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoa Thi Tuyet Le & Vinh Tuan Tran & Nhan Thi Pham Nguyen & Nam Sy Ngo & Toan Luu Duc Huynh, 2018. "The Influence of Peg and F_Score on Stock Return by Valued Investment Portfolios: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(3), pages 366-377.
    • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:366-377:id:1680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1680/2470
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1680/3145
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:366-377:id:1680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.