IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v7y2017i12p1317-1325id1644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management and Performance Empirical Study of Islamic Rural Banking in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Sutrisno

Abstract

Banking is an institution which has its operations highly regulated by the government, thus the management must be able to manage risks. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of risk management on the performance of Islamic rural banking in Indonesia. The performance of Islamic rural banking is measured by return on assets (ROA), while risk management consists of financing risk that measured by nen-performing financing (NPF), capital risk as measured by capital adequacy ratio (CAR), liquidity risk as measured by financing do deposit ratio (FDR), risk of management as measured by net profit margin (NPM), and operating risk is measured by operating expense to operating income ratio (OEOI). The population of this study was the Islamic rural banking operating in Indonesia with a sample consisted of 55 banks taken by using purposive sampling method. The observation was conducted in 2 years (2015-2016) with quarterly data. The hypothesis test was conducted by using multiple regression analysis and was assisted by using SPSS version 17.0 program. The results showed that financing risk (NPF) and operating risk (OEOI) had a negative and significant effect on bank performance, while liquidity risk (FDR) and risk of management (NPM) had a positive and significant effect on bank performance. Meanwhile, capital risk (CAR) had no significant effect on bank performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sutrisno, 2017. "Risk Management and Performance Empirical Study of Islamic Rural Banking in Indonesia," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(12), pages 1317-1325.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:7:y:2017:i:12:p:1317-1325:id:1644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1644/2407
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:7:y:2017:i:12:p:1317-1325:id:1644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.