IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v7y2017i10p943-951id1607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Institutional Rank Ordering Qualitative or Quantitative?

Author

Listed:
  • Habip Koçak
  • Ahmet Mete Çilingirtürk
  • Vildan Kistik

Abstract

In competitive markets, companies search their positions according to their competitors with internal resources or make use of the services of market research firms. Various credit and rating agencies or co-ordination for sectors with some social and political remediation also examine and rank the companies in these sectors. These companies are listed on the Stock Exchange Istanbul. Petroleum and derivatives industries, which are important sources of energy for industrial and Turkey, have been reconsidered in the Fortune 500 ranking by MOORA and COPRAS optimization methods and with statistical factor analysis with various efficiency and size indicating financial ratios. The results obtained are consistent within themselves and differ from the Fortune 500 rank order. The difference between quality and quantity can lead companies to wrong strategies in this sort of ranking. The study might be important to bring out efficiency and productivity in the sense of planning possible strategic changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Habip Koçak & Ahmet Mete Çilingirtürk & Vildan Kistik, 2017. "Does Institutional Rank Ordering Qualitative or Quantitative?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(10), pages 943-951.
    • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:7:y:2017:i:10:p:943-951:id:1607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1607/2344
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:7:y:2017:i:10:p:943-951:id:1607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.