IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v4y2014i11p1681-1690id1298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commercial Bank Non-Interest Fee Charges: Are Fee Charges Different Between Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks? Evidence from Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Abdus Samad

Abstract

In the Western world, consumers complain about the soaring of non-interest bank fees during the recent years, the post global financial crisis in particular. Commercial banks charge a variety of non-interest fees for their transactions. This paper empirically tests whether the free charges are significantly different between conventional commercial banks and interest free Islamic banks. The average noninterest expenses to assets are 0.017 and 0.011 for conventional banks and Islamic banks respectively. The paper finds, using parametric test and nonparametric tests, no significant differences in noninterest expenses between conventional banks and Islamic banks. The competitive banking market of Bangladesh, suggested by low Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, is an important factor for the equality of mean fee charges between the conventional banks and the Islamic banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdus Samad, 2014. "Commercial Bank Non-Interest Fee Charges: Are Fee Charges Different Between Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks? Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(11), pages 1681-1690.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:4:y:2014:i:11:p:1681-1690:id:1298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/1298/1835
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Setyawati, Irma, 2018. "Global financial crisis 2008 and its vulnerability in SAARC countries," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(4), pages 766-776, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:4:y:2014:i:11:p:1681-1690:id:1298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.