IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v11y2021i5p384-395id2091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Stock Market Efficient? Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests for Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Adedoyin Isola LAWAL
  • Ezekiel OSENI
  • Abiola John ASALEYE
  • Bukola LAWAL-ADEDOYIN
  • Rachael OJEKA-JOHN

Abstract

This study re-examined the traditional research topic in finance—the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) within the context of a nonlinearity unit root test using daily data sourced on the Nigerian economy. This was premised on two key motivations. First, the study observed that most of the existing studies on EMH are based on an aggregate stock index and the presence of heterogeneity of listed firms on the floor of the exchange can make the results obtained from aggregate stock price-based tests misleading due to spuriousness. To overcome this, the study tested the validity of EMH at a sectorial level. The second motivation centers on the observed nonlinear property of the time series data used in the existing literature. The study first examines the unit root properties of the data by applying the Harvey, Leybourne, and Xiao (2008) methods. The results indicate rejections of the null hypothesis for all the series, an indication that stock market indices in Nigeria are nonlinear and asymmetric in nature. This suggests that results obtained from linear based models could be biased. In order to achieve more accurate results, the study applied the ESPAR model and observed that, overall, there is an abundance of evidence to show that the Nigerian stock exchange is mean reverting, thus investors are advised to adopt a contrarian investment strategy to maximize the opportunities in the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Adedoyin Isola LAWAL & Ezekiel OSENI & Abiola John ASALEYE & Bukola LAWAL-ADEDOYIN & Rachael OJEKA-JOHN, 2021. "Is the Stock Market Efficient? Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests for Nigeria," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(5), pages 384-395.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:384-395:id:2091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/2091/3333
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/2091/7385
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:384-395:id:2091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.