IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v11y2021i10p781-793id4333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Market React to the Reputation of Capital Expenditure?

Author

Listed:
  • Juniarti
  • Agus Arianto Toly

Abstract

A phenomenon found in several case studies shows that investors are more interested in the projection of firm value than in periodic financial performance. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether the reputation of capital expenditure is an indication of a promising future for a company, so that it responds positively to the market. The research samples used were companies that had the highest increase in shares in their sectors during the Q1 2017 to Q2 2019 period. We used Tobin's Q (TQ) and cumulative abnormal return (CAR) as proxies for market response. The findings of this study are, first, that the market responded positively to the reputation of corporate capital expenditure, as seen from asset growth. Second, in the sample group with positive asset growth trends in the last five years, the reputation of capital expenditure, proxied by total assets and total fixed assets, consistently received positive responses from investors. Third, the market responded negatively, or had no response, to capital expenditure made by companies that had a negative growth trend. The results of this study invalidate the findings of previous studies that good financial performance responds positively. This study proves that the capital expenditure of a company is more of a concern to investors than its current performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Juniarti & Agus Arianto Toly, 2021. "Does the Market React to the Reputation of Capital Expenditure?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(10), pages 781-793.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:781-793:id:4333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/4333/6697
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/4333/7441
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:781-793:id:4333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.