IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/aeafrj/v10y2020i12p1366-1383id2021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Planned Breaks on Worker Productivity and the Moderate Role of Workload in a Manufacturing Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Siyuan Yi
  • Qiguo Gong
  • Feng Dong
  • Hui Wang

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to empirically explore the impact of planned breaks on employee productivity and the moderate role of workload in a manufacturing environment. The dataset for this research, which comprises 3043985 records, was collected from assembly lines in a manufacturing company, and the Prais–Winsten regression model was used to empirically analyze the relationship between productivity and breaks. The results showed that productivity improved during the 30 minutes before the start of a break, which mainly resulted from employees’ expectations of the upcoming break and the alleviation of any negative emotions due to their current work. It was also found that productivity declined during the 30 minutes after the end of a break due to the dominating effect of forgetting the recent rest and having a disordered work rhythm in the manufacturing environment. Additionally, it was noticed that a lighter workload mitigated the negative post-break impact on productivity while reinforcing the pre-break positive impact on productivity. The results implicate that managers should schedule breaks for employees and appropriately reduce their workload to improve productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyuan Yi & Qiguo Gong & Feng Dong & Hui Wang, 2020. "The Effect of Planned Breaks on Worker Productivity and the Moderate Role of Workload in a Manufacturing Environment," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(12), pages 1366-1383.
    • Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:10:y:2020:i:12:p:1366-1383:id:2021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/2021/3227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/article/view/2021/7284
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:v:10:y:2020:i:12:p:1366-1383:id:2021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5002/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.