IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jtsrta/v24y2017i2p21-29id193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Work Attitudes of Japanese Employees from the Perspective of Decent Work

Author

Listed:
  • Shiho Futagami
  • Yukiko Muramoto

Abstract

The study analyses work attitudes of Japanese employees from the perspective of decent work. A survey was conducted in respect of Japanese employees working in engineering and retailing companies. In the study the following questions are asked: What determinants make Japanese employees feel their work to be decent work? What are the consequences for Japanese employees and companies, if decent work is actualized ? Currently, decent work is the key concept in respect of the activities of the International Labour Organization (ILO). In this study, decent work is defined as work of high quality, in which employees feel a sense of achievement, enjoy communication with colleagues and have support for work-life balance. The study clarifies the predictors and outcomes of decent work satisfaction for employees. From the results of multiple regression analysis, employability through off the job training (Off-JT) and on the job training (OJT) opportunities are important predictors satisfying decent work. The variable of the industry also contributes to decent work satisfaction for them. Additionally, high decent work satisfaction could lead to high job involvement for them. Finally, the study suggests effective Human Resource Management (HRM) proposals for Japanese companies from the perspective of decent work.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiho Futagami & Yukiko Muramoto, 2017. "A Study on Work Attitudes of Japanese Employees from the Perspective of Decent Work," Journal Transition Studies Review, Transition Academia Press, vol. 24(2), pages 21-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:24:y:2017:i:2:p:21-29:id:193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/article/view/193/131
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Transition Studies Review
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:24:y:2017:i:2:p:21-29:id:193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.