IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jtsrta/v22y2015i2p79-108id83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is R&D Upgrading China from Imitation to Innovation? An Institutional Analysis of Absorptive Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhao

Abstract

With its massive investment in R&D, China is generally believed to be getting outfrom the stage of little in-house R&D, building up more R&D capability quickly, andwill gradually become powerful in its own in-house R&D so as to remain globallycompetitive with its own technology. This paper evaluates China’s innovation capabilityat the firm level, with consideration of the overall situation of R&D activities carriedout by firms in China. It is true that many Chinese local firms have jumped from theOEM stage to ODM stage, and many private and State-owned firms begin to haveheavy R&D investment as well. But these product design and R&D activities seemto stagnate at a halfway level. Also some high-end R&D efforts seem to be shrinking.Though most Chinese firms, through a long period of process of technological learningand capability accumulation, finally begin to invest in R&D and carry out relevantprojects, the quality of R&D activities is not so well achieved. The low quality ofR&D investment of Chinese firms is due to the absence of absorptive capacity, i.e.,the high quality external linkages established around Chinese firms, which in turnimpedes the efficiency and effectiveness of in-house R&D projects. Such an absenceof absorptive capacity or efficient innovation linkages has its institutional reason inthe Chinese context. Chinese policy makers shall deepen their perspective on theso-called national innovation system, discover and tackle the real linkage problemswhich are depressing China’s innovation capacity right now.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhao, 2015. "Is R&D Upgrading China from Imitation to Innovation? An Institutional Analysis of Absorptive Capacity," Journal Transition Studies Review, Transition Academia Press, vol. 22(2), pages 79-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:22:y:2015:i:2:p:79-108:id:83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/article/view/83/61
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Transition Studies Review
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:22:y:2015:i:2:p:79-108:id:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.