IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jtsrta/v22y2015i1p69-88id28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Market Efficiency from Option Prices Evidence from the National Stock Exchange of India

Author

Listed:
  • Imlak Shaikh
  • Puja Padhi

Abstract

This paper investigates the market efficiency of S&P CNX Nifty equity index options for at-the-money non-overlapping monthly implied volatilities. Under the rational expectation hypothesis, call and put implied volatilities are calculated using Black and Scholes option pricing-model for the period June, 2001 to May, 2011. The ordinary least squares estimation clearly shows that implied volatility is the best estimate of future realized volatility. An empirical result on Granger causality shows that there is only unidirectional causality prevails in the Indian options market. Granger causality test (Sims and Geweke) indicates that calland put implied volatility causes the realized volatility but realized volatility cannot cause implied volatility. Granger causality test also confirms that for Indian options market historical volatility does not subsume useful information what already contained in the option price (i.e. implied volatility). The study concludes that volatility estimates based on the option’s price are the best estimate for the future volatility and useful in the pricing of derivatives and portfolio-risk-management.

Suggested Citation

  • Imlak Shaikh & Puja Padhi, 2015. "A Study of Market Efficiency from Option Prices Evidence from the National Stock Exchange of India," Journal Transition Studies Review, Transition Academia Press, vol. 22(1), pages 69-88.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:22:y:2015:i:1:p:69-88:id:28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/article/view/28/6
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Transition Studies Review
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:22:y:2015:i:1:p:69-88:id:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.