IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jtsrta/v21y2014i1p63-89id39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the EU and China Wind Energy Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Ho-Ching Lee
  • Pei-Fei Chang

Abstract

This paper examines the driving forces of the EU and China’s wind energy poli- cies change as well as critical problems in practice. Germany is used as a major case study representing the EU. However, this paper emphasizes less on Germany and more on China’s wind energy policy changes.This is because China’s wind energy policy appears to be less mature than that of Germany, and that the former seems to be changing more often than the latter. A contribution of this paper is that the data on China’s wind energy policy is mainly collected from interviews with Chinese central government officials, state-owned enterprises, and scholars. By comparing Germany and China’s wind energy policies, this paper uses a set of analytical factors. They are institutional framework, policy objectives, national government intervention, market and advanced technology.This paper concludes that it is not possible for both countries neglect concerns of both energy security and climate change in wind energy policy-making. Even though Germany is advanced than China in wind power development, both countries seem to face a common future problem in expanding grid connection for off- grid wind. For both counties, grid connection plays a crucial role in ensuring stable wind energy supply for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho-Ching Lee & Pei-Fei Chang, 2014. "Comparing the EU and China Wind Energy Policies," Journal Transition Studies Review, Transition Academia Press, vol. 21(1), pages 63-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:21:y:2014:i:1:p:63-89:id:39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/article/view/39/17
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Transition Studies Review
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jtsrta:v:21:y:2014:i:1:p:63-89:id:39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jtsr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.