IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jgpgta/v8y2019i1p83-100id242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Abe administration’s policy about the Senkaku Islands and role theory

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuro Debroux

Abstract

The article shows the result of the research on foreign policy about the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands during the Second Abe administration. It focuses on Japan’s relations with the US and China. Role theory, centered on its key concept of national role conceptions (NRC) is used as a theoretical framework. Using Japanese and foreign political leaders’ statements, NRC analysis gives the opportunity to grasp the degree of consistency between those of Japan and those of the targeted countries. Three key Japan’s NRCs: protector of Japanese sovereignty; promotor of universal values; realist who aims to avoid exacerbating diplomatic relations with the neighboring countriesare found. This paper argues that Prime Minister Abe is determined to protect Japan’s sovereignty but his first aim to reinforce the administration over the islands has not been achieved. The US supports Japan’s administrative right but opposes any Japan’s behavior which destabilizes East Asian security environment. China claims its territorial right over the islands for historical reason and cannot compromise to maintain its domestic legitimacy. Abe increase Japan’s deterrent near the Senkaku Islands and promotes value-oriented diplomacy to in this region and to secure the sea lane which is vital for Japan’s economy. Abe says that he does not refuse a dialogue but it does mean Japan is willing to make a concession. As a result, the territorial dispute remains unresolved.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuro Debroux, 2019. "The Abe administration’s policy about the Senkaku Islands and role theory," Journal Global Policy and Governance, Transition Academia Press, vol. 8(1), pages 83-100.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:83-100:id:242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/article/view/242/169
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Global Policy and Governance
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:83-100:id:242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.