IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jgpgta/v8y2019i1p67-82id240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Performance Evaluation: from the International Debate to the Italian Legal Context

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Dmitrievna Dokalskaya

Abstract

In recent years, public administration has experienced a period of strong pressure for change, innovation and modernization that has led in an increasing emphasis on measuring and reporting of results. Still public sector reforms continue to preoccupy governments all over the world, since the controversies remain a problem with the integration of decisions concerning the use of the budget means allocated to the results obtained. Because of modernization reforms, the structural foundation of public organizations has changed in many countries. As part of NPM reforms, public organizations have adopted (or trying to) private sector-inspired management techniques, with the declared intention of improving both the quality and productivity of services. The primary cause of this situation have been the growing needs from citizens of services and policies in terms of quality, that public authorities have had and will have to satisfy with increasingly scarce resources. Considering the necessity of greater understanding of the economic and financial performance, this paper discusses the possible modalities, the experiences and the most appropriate processes needed to achieve the strategic and policy objectives for maintaining and improving the quality of services, ensuring the effectiveness of administrative function.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Dmitrievna Dokalskaya, 2019. "Public Performance Evaluation: from the International Debate to the Italian Legal Context," Journal Global Policy and Governance, Transition Academia Press, vol. 8(1), pages 67-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:67-82:id:240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/article/view/240/168
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Global Policy and Governance
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:67-82:id:240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.