Author
Abstract
The ongoing transformation of the energy sector, driven by the global push for decarbonization, technological advancements, and energy security, positions small modular reactors (SMRs) as a pivotal innovation in the portfolio of energy enterprises. This study explores SMRs as a key sustainable development direction for energy companies aiming to meet stringent environmental goals while addressing growing energy demands. Various types of fuel such as LEU (Low-Enriched Uranium), HALEU (High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium), TRISTO (Tri-Structural Isotropic), Molten Salt Fuel and MOX (Mixed Oxide Fuel) were also analyzed in terms of their properties and possibilities of use in SMRs. The research incorporates secondary data to examine the economic, environmental, and strategic implications of adopting SMRs. Insights are drawn from global case studies and industry reports, highlighting the potential for SMRs to enhance operational efficiency, reduce costs, and support the transition to a low-carbon economy. The study also identifies key challenges, including regulatory barriers, public acceptance, and technological readiness, that must be addressed to fully realize the potential of SMRs. the findings underscore the critical role of SMRs in enabling energy enterprises to achieve sustainability while maintaining competitiveness in an evolving energy landscape. Companies like Rolls-Royce SMR, NuScale Power, Rosatom, General Electric Hitachi, and Kairos Power are pushing the boundaries of technology by investing heavily in research and development initiatives. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how SMRs can serve as a corner-stone of innovation and adaptability in the energy sector, paving the way for resilient and sustainable energy systems in the future.
Suggested Citation
Piotr F. Borowski, 2025.
"Nuclear Small Reactors as a Key Solution in the Net-Zero Transition,"
Journal of Sustainable Development Issues (JOSDI), SDIjournals, vol. 3(1), pages 97-116, June.
Handle:
RePEc:arv:journl:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:97-116
DOI: 10.62433/josdi.v3i1.54
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
- Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arv:journl:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:97-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shahriyar Mukhtarov (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.