IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2019p819-825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judicial Education Development Issues and Prospects in the Republic of Kazakhstan in the Light of the OECD Countries’ Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Zhumabek Busurmanov

    (Academy of Justice under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Aiman Kussainova

    (Academy of Justice under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Lazzat Nazarkulova*

    (Academy of Justice under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Almas Kanatov

    (Academy of Justice under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

The relevance of the topic is determined by the needs of modern Kazakhstani society in an independent judiciary and highly professional judges, capable of being a genuine guarantor of human and citizen rights and freedoms. Based on the study of the OECD countries’ experience, it is argued that it is the judicial education that plays a key role in the formation of an independent, highly professional judiciary. The current state of judicial education in the Republic of Kazakhstan and its development issues are considered. Prospective directions of its development are justified based on the OECD countries’ experience. A number of measures for improving judicial education is argued to be undertaken: the need for compulsory special training of candidates for the position of a judge, the development of teaching staff through the involvement of the best sitting judges in the training process, and the need to remove judicial education from the executive authorities. The role of new technologies in the development of judicial education is particularly mentioned.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhumabek Busurmanov & Aiman Kussainova & Lazzat Nazarkulova* & Almas Kanatov, 2019. "Judicial Education Development Issues and Prospects in the Republic of Kazakhstan in the Light of the OECD Countries’ Experience," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 819-825, 03-2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:819-825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr5(3)819-825.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/archive/03-2019/3/5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:819-825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.