IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2019p389-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Character of Biology Teaching Practices: Pedagogical Hiatuses and the Implications for Continued Professional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Eng Tek Ong*

    (Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malayia)

  • Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh

    (Department of English Language & Literature, Faculty of Languages and Communication, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia)

  • Nurulhuda Abd Rahman

    (Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia)

  • Laili Farhana Md Ibharim

    (Faculty of Art, Computing and Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study was conducted to characterise the Biology teaching practices in a teacher education institution so as to inform us the existing practices which could then be compared with the aspired practices, uncovering the pedagogical hiatuses. This study employed a form of implementation study using classroom observation. A total of three lessons drawn from a Biology course within the Bachelor of Education (Biology Major) by a lecturer in one Teacher Education Institution were observed over a one-semester period. A psychometrically-supported Observation Checklist comprising 50 items or indicators that spread across six principles was utilised in the observation whereby observers checked in terms of presence or absence of each indicator during the classroom observations. In terms of coverage of aspired teaching practices which met the quartile rule (i.e., practices which were observed more than one-fourth or 25% in the overall observations), the findings indicated that lecturers fully ensured constructive instructional alignment (100%), fostered intellectual excitement (66.7%), provided quality spaces, technology and resources (57.1%), nurtured good values, attitudes and behaviours (45.5%), nurtured a climate of inquiry and critical reflection (42.9%). Nevertheless, the characterised teaching practices indicated that the lecturer did not offer adequate diverse learning environment (20.0%). This study provides the characterisation of evidenced-based practices, uncovering the pedagogical hiatuses which could be subsequently addressed by various means such as the providence of continuous in-service courses. Empowering lecturers pedagogically will produce quality teachers which in turn, produce quality students.

Suggested Citation

  • Eng Tek Ong* & Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh & Nurulhuda Abd Rahman & Laili Farhana Md Ibharim, 2019. "The Character of Biology Teaching Practices: Pedagogical Hiatuses and the Implications for Continued Professional Development," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 389-399, 02-2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:389-399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr5(2)389-399.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/archive/02-2019/2/5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristina Sonmark & Nóra Révai & Francesca Gottschalk & Karolina Deligiannidi & Tracey Burns, 2017. "Understanding teachers' pedagogical knowledge: report on an international pilot study," OECD Education Working Papers 159, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loredana Manasia & Maria Gratiela Ianos & Teodora Daniela Chicioreanu, 2019. "Pre-Service Teacher Preparedness for Fostering Education for Sustainable Development: An Empirical Analysis of Central Dimensions of Teaching Readiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:389-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.