IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p970-983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ERP Sand Clock Barriers and Antecedents Model: From the Lens of Task Technology Fit Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Sharina Tajul Urus*

    (Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Tuan Zainun Tuan Mat

    (Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Sharifah Nazatul Faiza Syed Mustapha Nazri

    (Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Fadzlina Mohd Fahmi

    (Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

The deployment of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems worldwide has become an evidence of the unprecedented movement towards integration of information technologies. The importance of continuance usage during the post implementation stage should not be neglected as to secure an optimal advantages offered by ERP system, that is achieved through minimizing ERP system usage barriers. As such, successful implementation of an ERP system does not necessarily guarantee that the system will be comprehensively used or accepted by users of the system. ERP benefits can only be realised and sustained if users continue to have favourable experiences in using the system. While many previous studies have examined ERP system during the implementation phase, only a few have revealed barriers to ERP usage as well its antecedent factors during the post-implementation phase. The purpose of this paper is to determine ERP system usage barriers and unearth the root causes to the barriers. To achieve the aim, this research was guided by the ‘soft-positivism’ paradigm, a paradigm that combines elements of positivism and interpretivism. By using this paradigm, the investigator brought certain prior expectations to the data analysis which are consistent with positivist research and which also build rich explanations from the data, consistent with the interpretive assumption. Based upon the lens of Task Technology Fit theory, this study adopts a qualitative method using multiple case studies. Three Malaysian organisations that had implemented ERP were investigated by conducting 30 semi–structured interviews and reviewing archival records and documents. The interviews were guided by the research objectives. Data were analysed by using open and thematic coding.The finding indicated four major areas of ERP usage problems: system, data, and technical infrastructure and interface problems. Besides that, several antecedent factors to the problems were identified. These factors fall into four major categories: organisation, user, task and technology, and include lack of support from either external or internal expertise, lack of individual strength and limited technology affordance. The outcome of this study was encapsulated in the form of the ERP Sand Clock Barriers and Antecedents Model.The paper contributes to post-implementation ERP system literature by stressing the complex relationships between usage barriers and antecedent factors. By identifying the underlying causes of SAP usage barriers, it could become the motivating factor for individual users to undertake reflective feedback and to achieve extended use of the implemented ERP system.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharina Tajul Urus* & Tuan Zainun Tuan Mat & Sharifah Nazatul Faiza Syed Mustapha Nazri & Fadzlina Mohd Fahmi, 2018. "ERP Sand Clock Barriers and Antecedents Model: From the Lens of Task Technology Fit Theory," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 970-983:5.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:970-983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi5.1-970-983.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/5/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:970-983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.