IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p49-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Using Collaborative Writing Method and Metacognitive Writing Method in Enhancing Students’ Writing in Secondary School Education

Author

Listed:
  • Taufik Arochman*

    (Pascasarjana – Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Margana

    (Pascasarjana – Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study was aimed to find out: (1) whether the use of collaborative writing method is more effective than the use of metacognitive writing method in the teaching of writing ability, (2) whether the use of collaborative writing method is more effective than the use of conventional writing method, (3) whether the use of metacognitive writing method is more effective than the use of conventional writing method, (4) the most effective method among collaborative writing method, metacognitive writing method, and conventional writing method in the teaching writing ability. This study was a quasi-experimental research. The data were collected from 108 students of secondary school in February-March 2018 in Yogyakarta. The sample of the study was the students of Muhammadiyah School in Yogyakarta which were determined by using cluster simple random sampling. There were four hypotheses of this study and the research findings revealed that the hypotheses were accepted. It was indicated by all of the Sig values which were lower than the level of significance (0.05).

Suggested Citation

  • Taufik Arochman* & Margana, 2018. "The Effectiveness of Using Collaborative Writing Method and Metacognitive Writing Method in Enhancing Students’ Writing in Secondary School Education," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 49-55:2.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:49-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi2.19.49.55.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/11-2018/2/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:49-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.