IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p439-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Notion of the Sound Law and Its Criticizers

Author

Listed:
  • Anzhela R. Lisenko*

    (Kazan Federal University, Russia)

  • Ilmira M. Rakhimbirdieva

    (Kazan Federal University, Russia)

Abstract

This article deals with the problematic nature of the concept of sound law in linguistics, where the authors attempt to comprehend the reasons for the sharp criticism of this concept in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, by relying on the modern understanding of science on the whole and the status of scientific law in particular. The paper gives a brief historical reference to the formation of the concept of scientific law, which was a prerequisite for the emergence of the sound law in linguistics. It gives the postulates by Osthoff (1878) and K. Bruggmann who swore allegiance to the sound law and represents their sharp criticism by such linguists as H. (Baudouin, 1968; Saussure, 1977). Investigating the works by the critics of Neogrammarian concept, the authors attempt to determine the causes of the problematic nature of this concept, which later would help determine the modern status of the scientific law in linguistics, and accordingly, the possibility of the existence of sound laws.

Suggested Citation

  • Anzhela R. Lisenko* & Ilmira M. Rakhimbirdieva, 2018. "The Notion of the Sound Law and Its Criticizers," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 439-442:1.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:439-442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/SPI-1-50-439-442.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/11-2018/1/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:439-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.