IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p1213-1217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Qualifications of Arbitral Tribunal: Perspectives of Shariah Law and UNCITRAL Model Law

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Saleh Abdullah Bawazir

    (School of Law, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Mohammad Azam Hussain*

    (School of Law, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia)

Abstract

Arbitration is an alternative mechanism which can be adopted by the parties involved in any legal issues other than the court. Arbitral tribunal plays essential role and has roles and functions similar to the court judges. Only qualified person is eligible to be appointed as arbitrator. From Islamic perspective, the Muslim jurists have laid down several requirements to be fulfilled by such person before the appointment has been made. The UNCITRAL Model Law which is internationally adopted by most of the countries in the world in setting up their arbitration institution also has a provision pertaining to the qualifications of arbitral tribunal. The question arises, what are the qualifications required under Shariah law and prescribed by UNCITRAL Model Law? Is there any similarities? Based on such research questions, this article seeks to analyse the qualifications of the arbitral tribunal from the perspectives of Shariah law and UNCITRAL Model Law. Based on the library data, content analysis method is adopted to compare the qualifications of arbitral tribunal from both perspective. This study found that, the Shariah law and UNCITRAL Model Law have its own requirements for the person to be appointed as arbitrator. The study also found that, Shariah law provides more details in this regard compared to UNCITRAL Model Law which provides only the general principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Saleh Abdullah Bawazir & Mohammad Azam Hussain*, 2018. "The Qualifications of Arbitral Tribunal: Perspectives of Shariah Law and UNCITRAL Model Law," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1213-1217:6.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1213-1217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi6.16.1213.1217.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/6/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1213-1217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.