IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p1151-1157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peacebuilding Model of Third-Party Mediation in the Philippines: Comparing Malaysia and the OIC

Author

Listed:
  • Shamsuddin Taya*

    (Department of International Affairs, School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Rusdi Omar

    (Department of International Affairs, School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Che Mohd Aziz Yaacob

    (Department of International Affairs, School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Abdul Lantong

    (Cotabato City State Polytechnic College, Sinsuat Avenue, 9600 Cotabato City, Philippines)

Abstract

Many nation-states have increasingly found themselves in a situation where they are unable to sort out their domestic conflicts without third party mediation. This is particularly true for a country like the Government of the Philippines (GPH) who has been fighting violent protracted internal conflicts for many decades against Bangsamoro revolutionary groups. Therefore, with respect to the above, the purpose of this article is to compare peacebuilding models of third party mediation to the Bangsamoro conflicts with particular focus between Malaysia and the Organization of Islamic Conference, presently Cooperation (OIC). Its approach is primarily an eclectic, by concentrating on the strengths and weaknesses of the peacebuilding models of the third party mediation as employed by both Malaysia and OIC. The article is divided into two major parts. The first part discussed both Malaysia and OIC’s diplomatic approaches in dealing with the Bangsamoro conflict, while the second part explained inclusivity versus exclusivity of both Malaysia and the OIC respectively. The study found that Malaysia’s model is more durable and successful when compared to OIC’s. In fact, Malaysia’s quiet diplomacy and less confrontational approach with greater inclusivity were more effective compared to elitist and confrontational approach of the OIC’s mediation to the Bangsamoro conflicts. Indeed, the Government of the Philippines and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (GPH-MILF) peace process is one of the most inclusive peace processes in the world. It may have some who were left out in the peace process, but they were all consulted by both Manila and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) as opposed to OIC mediated Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Moro National Liberation Front (GRP-MNLF) peace negotiations. Therefore, it is pertinent to conclude that there is nothing that resembles the inclusivity of the GPH-MILF peace process that characterized the exclusivity of the GRP-MNLF peace process.

Suggested Citation

  • Shamsuddin Taya* & Rusdi Omar & Che Mohd Aziz Yaacob & Abdul Lantong, 2018. "Peacebuilding Model of Third-Party Mediation in the Philippines: Comparing Malaysia and the OIC," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1151-1157:6.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1151-1157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi6.3.1.1151.1157.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/6/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1151-1157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.