IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2015p86-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Evaluation and Students’ Perception of Their Grades: A Game Theory Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chen-Chang Lo

    (I-Shou University, Taiwan)

  • Guych Nuryyev

    (I-Shou University, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Hui Su

    (I-Shou University, Taiwan)

  • Patrick Decosta

    (Australian National University, Australia)

Abstract

This paper revisits the discussion of the relationship between students’ grades and their teaching evaluation. The literature on this relationship is inconclusive. This paper studies a relationship between students’ perception of their grades and their teaching evaluations. The analysis of this paper employs teaching evaluation surveys carried out before and after the examination. This helps segregate the effect of the grade perception on teaching evaluation from other factors. This study also tests if the difference between expected and received grades affects teaching evaluation. Using multinomial logistical regressions, we found no evidence that instructors and students trade grades for teaching evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen-Chang Lo & Guych Nuryyev & Shu-Hui Su & Patrick Decosta, 2015. "Teaching Evaluation and Students’ Perception of Their Grades: A Game Theory Approach," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 1(7), pages 86-93, 11-2015.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2015:p:86-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr1(7)86-93.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&month=11-2015&issue=7&volume=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2015:p:86-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.