IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/rjbarp/2017p25-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Incidence and Outcome of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Cirrhotic Patients with Ascites in East Indian Population

Author

Listed:
  • Ranbeer kumar Singh

    (Department of microbiology, Narayam Medical College and Hospital, Jamuhar, Sasaram, Bihar, India)

  • Dipak kushwaha

    (Department of medicine NMCT&H Birgunj, Nepal)

  • Amitesh Kumar

    (Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna-14, India)

  • S.S.Haque

    (Department of Biochemistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna-14, India)

  • Md.Tanweeruddin

    (Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical care , ECR, Danapur, India)

  • Tarique Aziz

    (Department of Biochemistry, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, India)

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is the most common infection of ascitic fluid that occurs in patients with cirrhotic ascites typically described in hospitalized patients. Objectives: To determine the prevalence, incidence and outcome of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in adult patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites admitted at Narayam Medical College and Hospital, Jamuhar, Sasaram, Bihar. Materials and methods: A study was conducted involving 60 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites between October 2013 and April 2014. Ascitic fluid culture, the gold standard for SBP diagnosis was done, for culture positive results susceptibility testing of common antibiotics using a disc diffusion method was done. Ascitic fluid cell count and bedside dipstick test were also done. Positive ascitic fluid culture, ascitic PMNs ?250cells/?L and positive dipstick test were diagnostic for SBP. Results: Out of 60 cases of Cirrhosis of liver, 43 (71.73%) patients were identified as cirrhotics of alcoholic etiology and 17 (28.26%) patients as cirrhotics of non- alcoholic etiology The incidence of SBP in Cirrhosis of Liver was 13 (20.65%) out of 60 patients in which 11(89.47 %) were male patients while 2 (10.25%) were female patients, showing that incidence of SBP is more in males compared to females. Out of total 13 cases of SBP, 10 (78.94%) cases were culture Positive Neutrocytic Ascites and 3 (21.05%) cases were culture Negative Neutrocytic Ascites, and out of 10 cases of culture positive neutrocytic ascites, 1 organism was isolated in 7 (73.33%) cases. Two organisms in 2 (20.00%) cases and 3 organisms in 1 (6.66%) cases indicating that incidence of monomicrobial neutrocytic ascites was highest ,seen in 7 (73.33%) cases compared to polymicrobial neutrocytic ascites ,which was least seen in 1 (6.66%) case. Out of 13 cases of SBP, death occurred in 5 (38%) cases and 8(62%) patients survive . Conclusion: Alcoholic cirrhosis is important contributing factor of SBP with liver cirrhosis than in non-alcoholic etiology. Therefore early recognition and prompt treatment of SBP can significantly reduce the mortality and morbidity of patients associated with decompensated cirrhosis of liver of alcoholic etiology and non alcoholic etiology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ranbeer kumar Singh & Dipak kushwaha & Amitesh Kumar & S.S.Haque & Md.Tanweeruddin & Tarique Aziz, 2017. "Evaluation of Incidence and Outcome of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Cirrhotic Patients with Ascites in East Indian Population," Journal of Biotechnology Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(4), pages 25-30, 04-2017.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:rjbarp:2017:p:25-30
    DOI: arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=16&info=aims
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jbr3(4)25-30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=16&month=04-2017&issue=4&volume=3
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=16&info=aims?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:rjbarp:2017:p:25-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=16&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.