IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/jacarp/2021p140-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Vegetative, Nutritional and Anatomical Study of Two Almond Varieties Grafted on Bitter Almond and Nemaguard Peach Rootstocks

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoud Sami Abou Rayya

    (Department of Horticultural Crops Technology, Agricultural & Biological Research Division, National Research Centre (NRC), 33 El-Buhouth St., 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt)

  • Nabila Elbadawy Kaseem

    (Department of Horticultural Crops Technology, Agricultural & Biological Research Division, National Research Centre (NRC), 33 El-Buhouth St., 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt)

  • Thanaa Shaban Mohamed Mahmoud

    (Department of Horticultural Crops Technology, Agricultural & Biological Research Division, National Research Centre (NRC), 33 El-Buhouth St., 12622 Dokki, Giza, Egypt)

Abstract

A comparative study was conducted during the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 growing seasons for Nonpareil and Ne Plus Ultra almond cvs grafted on Bitter almond and Nemaguard peach rootstocks at the Experimental Research Station of National Research Centre at Nubaria, El Behera governorate, Egypt. The comparison was evaluated through the grafting success percentage, vegetative growth, determination of some leaf mineral composition, as well as, the anatomical examination of scion/rootstock union zone and cross-section of leaves. The obtained results clarified that the grafting success percentage was significantly affected by the different used rootstocks. Using Bitter almond rootstock recorded the highest percentage of grafting success, leaf chlorophyll content, root length, and a number of lateral root /plant in both cultivars. Using Nemaguard peach rootstock recorded significantly the highest values of scion length, stem girth above and below union zone, number of branches and leaves/plant, leaf area as well as seedlings fresh and dry weight. Leaves of both cultivars grafted on Nemaguard peach rootstock recorded the highest concentrations of leaf mineral contents as compared to those grafted on Bitter almond rootstock. Cross-sections of the graft union zone were taken after 28 days and 6 months from grafting for anatomical analysis. The callus cells developed 28 days after grafting, but cambial cells between the rootstock and scion tissues did not occur in all scion/rootstock combinations. After 6 months of grafting, cambial cells were established, vascular differentiation was observed, regular parenchymatic tissue properties and sclerenchyma bundles were seen in the graft union. There was no problem in terms of compatibility of Nonpareil and Ne Plus Ultra on Bitter almond and Nemaguard peach rootstocks. Comparing leaf cross-sections of almond grafted on both rootstocks demonstrated that the density of mesophyll cells was affected as a consequence of the rootstock–scion interaction. Nemaguard peach rootstock can be recommended for grafting Nonpareil and Ne Plus Ultra almond cultivars under Nubaria conditions to produce vigorous trees.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmoud Sami Abou Rayya & Nabila Elbadawy Kaseem & Thanaa Shaban Mohamed Mahmoud, 2021. "Comparative Vegetative, Nutritional and Anatomical Study of Two Almond Varieties Grafted on Bitter Almond and Nemaguard Peach Rootstocks," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 7(4), pages 140-148, 10-2021.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2021:p:140-148
    DOI: 10.32861/jac.74.140.148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jac7(4)140-148.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/14/archive/10-2021/4/7
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32861/jac.74.140.148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2021:p:140-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=14&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.