IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/jacarp/2019p251-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Typology of Farms and Farmers’ Perception of the Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Practices in Northern Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Pale Siébou*

    (Institut de l?Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Ouagadougou 04 Burkina Faso)

  • Coulibaly Zoumité Christ Thierry Stephen

    (Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie, Ouagadougou 01 Burkina Faso)

  • Yonli Djibril

    (Institut de l?Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Ouagadougou 04 Burkina Faso)

  • Mason C. Stephen

    (University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, 279 Plant Science, Lincoln, USA)

  • Prasad P.V. Vara

    (Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Collaborative Research on Sustainable Intensification, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA)

  • Noufe Tiatité

    (Université de Ouahigouya, 01 BP 1412, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso)

  • Fofana Souleymane

    (Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de L?Analyse Economique de Dakar, Dakar, Sénégal)

  • Traore Hamidou

    (Institut de l?Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Ouagadougou 04 Burkina Faso)

  • Zachary P. Stewart

    (Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Collaborative Research on Sustainable Intensification, Kansas State University, Manhanttan, Kansas, USA)

Abstract

The continuous degradation of agroecosystem is a major concern for Sub-Saharan African countries, particularly Burkina Faso. To fight against this agroecosystem degradation, SWC such as stone rows, grass strips, zaï, filtering dikes, half-moons and agroforestry had been introduced in the Yatenga Province in Northern Burkina Faso several decades ago. Decades after introduction of SWC practices, a survey was conducted with 120 farmers equally distributed in four villages in the region to learn the farmers’ perceptions of the effects of these practices on their farms. Results revealed a higher proportion of men in the study sites (63%) compared to women. The largest difference in proportions between surveyed men and women was observed in Bogoya where only 22% of the surveyed persons were women. The average years of the respondents across villages was 53 years with 57% of farmers being members of at least one farmer organization. The proportion of educated farmers was 73% and those who received training in SWC techniques represented 36%. Results indicated that white grain sorghum and pearl millet were the main crops produced by 95% of farmers and stone rows and zaï were the dominant SWC techniques used by 77-80% of farmers. Data from the survey indicated a fairly high proportion of big ruminant breeders and small ruminant breeders as well. In fact, 79% of farmers bred big ruminants and 78% bred small ruminants. The main beneficial and direct effects of SWC techniques perceived by farmers was their capacity to improve soil fertility, recover soil, reduce water run-off, and allow good water infiltration in the field, thus improving soil productivity. Farmers pointed out indirect effects of SWC practices on livestock by the regeneration and increase of grass, tree and small shrub biomass available to improve animal growth and health. However, some farmers commented that the long-term use of zaï could lead to soil degradation. The study showed that farmers did perceive the beneficial effects of SWC practices and that greater extension and adoption will only be achieved if they could still receive training, financial and equipment supports.

Suggested Citation

  • Pale Siébou* & Coulibaly Zoumité Christ Thierry Stephen & Yonli Djibril & Mason C. Stephen & Prasad P.V. Vara & Noufe Tiatité & Fofana Souleymane & Traore Hamidou & Zachary P. Stewart, 2019. "Typology of Farms and Farmers’ Perception of the Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Practices in Northern Burkina Faso," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(12), pages 251-265, 12-2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2019:p:251-265
    DOI: 10.32861/jac.512.251.265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jac5(12)251-265.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/14/archive/12-2019/12/5
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32861/jac.512.251.265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:jacarp:2019:p:251-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=14&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.