IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/ijohms/2016p48-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of a German Questionnaire about General Practitioners’ Handling of Female Urinary Incontinence

Author

Listed:
  • Elke Faust

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinik Preetz, Am Krankenhaus 5, 24211 Preetz, Germany)

  • Martina Juergensen

    (Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany)

  • Susanne Elsner

    (Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany)

  • Achim Niesel

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinik Preetz, Am Krankenhaus 5, 24211 Preetz, Germany)

  • Annika Waldmann

    (Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Luebeck, Germany)

Abstract

Background: Recently our group performed a cross-sectional study in which 930 general practitioners (GP) in Germany and Denmark received a newly developed questionnaire concerning lower urinary tract symptoms. We developed the questionnaire on the basis of cognitive interviews with GPs and tested the reliability of the German version of the questionnaire in a test-retest process. Methods: 16 GPs took part in the test-retest process and completed the questionnaire twice with a time period of about four weeks between each attempt. The questionnaire consists of 28 questions. The given-answer categories and description fields sum up to a total of 60 items (answers). We assessed the reliability of answers by calculating and interpreting the absolute agreement and Cohen´s Kappa with a 95%-confidence interval for data that were nominal scaled and Pearson´s correlation coefficient for data that were interval scaled, respectively. Results: A total of 27 questions with 59 answer items were included in the analysis. Of them, 13 questions dealt with “management of UI†, six questions addressed the “communication about UI†, four questions asked for the “structure of the practice†, and five questions assessed personal data of the GP. Each more than 50% of the items in the subject areas “management of UI†(53.1%), “communication about UI†(66.6%), “structure of the practice†(57%), and “personal data†(100%) were rated as having high reliability. In summary, 35 of the analyzed items were rated a having a high reliability and 22 items were rated as having a moderate reliability. Conclusion: Given the low number of study participants our results have to be interpreted with caution, but is seems that the developed questionnaire is – for the vast majority of items – a reliable tool for assessing the communication about and the management of female urinary incontinence during a general practitioners’ consultation hour. Before application in future studies we recommend revising one item of the questionnaire in order to gain a higher reliability of this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Elke Faust & Martina Juergensen & Susanne Elsner & Achim Niesel & Annika Waldmann, 2016. "Reliability of a German Questionnaire about General Practitioners’ Handling of Female Urinary Incontinence," International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(9), pages 48-54, 09-2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:ijohms:2016:p:48-54
    DOI: arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=13&info=aims
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/ijhms2(9)48-54.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=13&month=09-2016&issue=9&volume=2
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=13&info=aims?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martina Jürgensen & Susanne Elsner & Louise Schreiber Pedersen & Elke Faust & Marie Louise Kold & Jessica Lückert & Achim Niesel & Martin Rudnicki & Annika Waldmann, 2016. "Development of a Bilingual Questionnaire about General Practitioners’ Handling of Female Urinary Incontinence," International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(5), pages 20-27, 05-2016.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:ijohms:2016:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=13&info=aims .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.