IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arh/jmabec/v99y2025i3p155-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical model for root cause analysis in the audit profession

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Groot

    (Vrije Universiteit , Amsterdam, Netherlands)

  • Caroline Meertens

    (PwC, Amsterdam, Netherlands)

  • Tom Winkelaar

    (PwC, Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Abstract

Audit firms conduct root cause analysis (RCA) to learn from errors and enhance future processes. This study aims to improve the effectiveness of these efforts by introducing a root cause taxonomy that categorizes underlying causes and develops a common language within the audit profession. Developed empirically and validated with data from an audit firm in the Netherlands, spanning from 2021 to 2024, the taxonomy includes six categories: Strategy and policy; Systems and procedures; Knowledge and understanding; Time and capacity; Human factors; and Client matters. Our findings reveal that the root causes frequently manifest in conjunction with one another rather than in isolation, indicating interdependencies. While the list of root causes is not exhaustive, this taxonomy offers a structured approach that can enhance consistency within the RCA practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Groot & Caroline Meertens & Tom Winkelaar, 2025. "An empirical model for root cause analysis in the audit profession," Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie Articles, Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, vol. 99(3), pages 155-161, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:arh:jmabec:v:99:y:2025:i:3:p:155-161
    DOI: 10.5117/mab.99.148806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mab-online.nl/article/148806/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5117/mab.99.148806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arh:jmabec:v:99:y:2025:i:3:p:155-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teodor Georgiev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mab-online.nl/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.