IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arh/jmabec/v96y2022i7-8p253-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time to audit your AI algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Iuliana Sandu

    (Rotterdam School of Management and Erasmus Center for Data Analytics, Rotterdam, Netherlands)

  • Menno Wiersma

    (Protiviti The Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands)

  • Daphne Manichand

    (Protiviti The Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Abstract

Undoubtedly, the use of algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms in particular, has numerous benefits. Fields such as finance, healthcare, automotive, education, and recruitment, to name a few, have demonstrated successful application of AI algorithms. Conversely, cases of bad algorithms abound and lead to lost revenue, discrimination, disinformation, or even bodily harm. Currently, we have surpassed the stage of just observing bad algorithms. New European regulations governing AI force organizations to manage the risks introduced by algorithms and convince the public about the proper functioning of algorithms. In this context, can algorithms be rigorously audited to build public trust and if yes, how? This article aims to answer these questions by building on an auditing framework for model risk management that controls for the novelty introduced by AI algorithms while connecting AI algorithm audit with internal audit terminology.

Suggested Citation

  • Iuliana Sandu & Menno Wiersma & Daphne Manichand, 2022. "Time to audit your AI algorithms," Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie Articles, Maandblad Voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, vol. 96(7-8), pages 253-265, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:arh:jmabec:v:96:y:2022:i:7-8:p:253-265
    DOI: 10.5117/mab.96.90108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mab-online.nl/article/90108/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5117/mab.96.90108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arh:jmabec:v:96:y:2022:i:7-8:p:253-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teodor Georgiev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mab-online.nl/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.