IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/ijsaam/v5y2021i1p11-22id7152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining Audit Quality in the Accounting Profession with Audit Ethics as a Moderating Variable

Author

Listed:
  • Sigit Hermawan

  • Duwi Rahayu

  • Sarwenda Biduri

  • Ruci Arizanda Rahayu

  • Nur Amalina Nisfa Salisa

Abstract

Obtaining information about a company’s financial statements has become increasingly important. Thus, highly skilled and expert public accountants are required who can execute their tasks following ethical standards. This study investigates the effects of audit professional skepticism and auditor expertise and integrity on audit quality in the accounting profession, with auditor ethics as the moderating variable. The study sample consisted of 65 auditors working in 14 public accounting firms in Surabaya, Indonesia. Data were collected through questionnaires and then analyzed using the SmartPLS approach. Results indicated that audit professional skepticism and auditor expertise and integrity positively influence audit quality. On one hand, auditor expertise, which is moderated by auditor ethics, positively influences audit quality. On the other hand, audit professional skepticism and integrity, which are moderated by auditor ethics, do not influence audit quality. The findings suggest that auditors must further improve their compliance with ethical standards to strengthen their integrity, which in turn, enables them to produce good audit quality. Furthermore, auditors must always strive to increase their professional skepticism and expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Sigit Hermawan & Duwi Rahayu & Sarwenda Biduri & Ruci Arizanda Rahayu & Nur Amalina Nisfa Salisa, 2021. "Determining Audit Quality in the Accounting Profession with Audit Ethics as a Moderating Variable," Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(1), pages 11-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:ijsaam:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:11-22:id:7152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/ijsam/article/view/7152/3176
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:ijsaam:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:11-22:id:7152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/ijsam/about/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.