IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/growth/v6y2019i1p1-11id986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time Preferences, Intertemporal Optimization, and the Permanent Income-Life Cycle Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroaki Hayakawa

Abstract

This paper analyzes how the three lines of development, namely, the structure of dynamic recursive preferences, Pontryagin's maximum principle, and the permanent income-life cycle hypothesis, are interrelated in the context of consumer choice in continuous time. First, by introducing variational changes in consumption around two different points in time that are compensating to the lifetime utility or having canceling effects on asset accumulation, we define and compute the marginal rates of substitution and transformation and express the optimality condition in terms of the instantaneous time rates of change of these rates. This condition is then related to the Böhm-Bawerkian and Fisherian rates of time preference, which are defined, calculated, and shown to give an equivalent measure whether inclusive of the first order change of consumption or not. The Keynes-Ramsey rule of consumption is related to this optimality condition and is given a new interpretation. Second, we inquire into the preference basis of the permanent income-life cycle hypothesis and show explicitly that the proportionality of optimal consumption to wealth and permanent income follows from the homotheticity of recursive time preferences and a dynamic budget constraint, thereby confirming that the hypothesis, as originally conceived by Friedman and Modigliani-Brumberg, is a dynamic version of the static demand under homothetic preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroaki Hayakawa, 2019. "Time Preferences, Intertemporal Optimization, and the Permanent Income-Life Cycle Hypothesis," Growth, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:growth:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:1-11:id:986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/Growth/article/view/986/1148
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:growth:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:1-11:id:986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/Growth/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.