IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/ajssms/v3y2016i4p266-271id499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditor Independence: Evidence from Ghanaian Polytechnics

Author

Listed:
  • Mawutorwu Doe
  • Frank Owusu
  • Eugene Oware Koranteng
  • Ebenezer Mensah Annan

Abstract

There is a perception that internal audit units (IAUs) in private and public sector organisations cannot be independent in executing their functions because the personnel of the units are on the one hand employees of their organisations and on the other hand expected to provide assurance services to management professionally. Such an outlook has the tendency to impair the credibility of IAUs as well as the professionalism of the IAU. This exploratory study examined the independence in appearance of the IAUs in selected Ghanaian polytechnics within the framework of organisational status of the IAUs, reporting line of the IAU and the power conferred on the Ghanaian public sector audit committee (AC) to ensure independence. Data was collected from the Directors of Audit (DOA) using a survey method. Results of the study suggest that the IAUs in Ghanaian polytechnics are largely independent in appearance. However, the study suggests that the Ghanaian AC has only an audit report implementation responsibility in reference to the enabling parliamentary act. The paper contributes to the auditing literature by providing some insights into the concept of auditor independence in public sector organisations within the context of national legislation and international best practice in the auditing profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Mawutorwu Doe & Frank Owusu & Eugene Oware Koranteng & Ebenezer Mensah Annan, 2016. "Auditor Independence: Evidence from Ghanaian Polytechnics," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(4), pages 266-271.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:ajssms:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:266-271:id:499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AJSSMS/article/view/499/502
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:ajssms:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:266-271:id:499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AJSSMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.