IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/ajssms/v12y2025i1p20-27id6806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the auditor truly a watchman or a gate keeper in Nigeria?

Author

Listed:
  • Uket E. Ewa
  • Etim Ndu Essien
  • Adesola, Wasiu Adebisi

Abstract

This study conceptually appraised the legal and regulatory instruments that created the Internal Audit Unit in the Nigeria Public Sector finance and the environmental operational analysis of the Internal Audit as well as the offices of the Auditors-General of the States and the Federation. Also, the perception of fraudulent practices among staff of MDAs has necessitated this study to ascertain if the Internal Auditor is really a Watchman or Gatekeeper in line with Section 85(5) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution as amended. The study employed conceptual review of the extant laws, circulars and related studies on the subject matter. The study revealed the lack of independence and security for the Auditors, ambiguous clauses prone to manipulation by officials in the current laws regulating the public sector financial operation and the offices of the Internal Auditor and Auditor-General. The study recommends the establishment of Audit Service Commission to handle operational matters relating to recruitment, training, and welfare, disciple of Internal Auditors and staff of the Auditors-General in Nigeria. Also review of the Audit Act, the Financial Regulation Law and other extant laws to guarantee Auditors independence, capacity and capability to detect and report fraudulent practices in the Public Sector finance management.

Suggested Citation

  • Uket E. Ewa & Etim Ndu Essien & Adesola, Wasiu Adebisi, 2025. "Is the auditor truly a watchman or a gate keeper in Nigeria?," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 12(1), pages 20-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:ajssms:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:20-27:id:6806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AJSSMS/article/view/6806/2992
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:ajssms:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:20-27:id:6806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AJSSMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.