IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/agafsr/v2y2015i2p43-50id177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tillage Methods to Determine Soil Infiltration Rates: A Case Study in Uyo, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Ime Etim
  • I.I. Ahuchaogu
  • A. I. Etuk

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of tillage methods on the infiltration rate of a sandy loam soil in Uyo. Nigeria. Tillage treatments adopted include zero –tillage, crude tillage, plough alone and plough harrow tillage. The result of the study revealed that the basic infiltration rates under zero crude, plough and plough harrow tillage in a sandy loam soil in Uyo were 18mm/hr, 20mm/hr, 21mm/hr and 24mm/hr respectively. Soil moisture content was averaged at 8.32% with a mean deviation of 0.372.The bulk density of the soil ranges from 0.611kg/m3 to 0.613kg/m3. The mean percentages of Sand, Silt and Clay from the analyzed Soil Sample were 74.43%, 13.64% and 16.69% respectively. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the significance difference between the average infiltration rates under the different tillage treatments. The result showed that there is a significant effect of tillage method on soil infiltration rate and soil infiltration rate under different tillage treatment followed the order plough + harrow > Plough alone > Crude tillage > Zero tillage. The study recommends that farmers in Uyo should endeavour to till their farm before planting at least with crude tillage implement as it will help to pulverize the soil surface and make it easier for irrigation and root penetration as well as root development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ime Etim & I.I. Ahuchaogu & A. I. Etuk, 2015. "Tillage Methods to Determine Soil Infiltration Rates: A Case Study in Uyo, Nigeria," Agriculture and Food Sciences Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 2(2), pages 43-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:agafsr:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:43-50:id:177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AESR/article/view/177/155
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:agafsr:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:43-50:id:177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AESR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.