IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/abeeat/v4y2018i1p10-21id723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indirect Regulatory Capture, Regulator and the Utility in Electricity Sector

Author

Listed:
  • J. G. L. S. Jayawardena
  • U. Anura Kumara
  • M. A. K. Sriyalatha

Abstract

This paper discussed the two cases of the regulatory decisions of the electricity sector regulator of Sri Lanka on renewable energy tariff calculation and approval of long term generation Expansion plan. The objectives of the analysis of the case studies are to examine how does utility can react on the regulatory decisions in the monopolistic market and whether it leads to a situation of Indirect Regulatory Capture. The regulatory process is examined from the perspective of various interest groups over the time, using Public Interest theory and Interest Group theory. The two cases are shown to have been strongly influenced by the interests of the different stakeholders of the electricity sector themselves, indicating a degree of 'regulatory capture'. The relationship of the utility and the regulator has been increasingly challenged by external pressures, interests of the stakeholders, and by, the level of resistance of the monopolistic utility. The paper concludes that in the monopolistic electricity market regulators decision can be reversed if the Utility is strong enough to resist the regulators decision if not favorable for the public or the utilities’ interest.

Suggested Citation

  • J. G. L. S. Jayawardena & U. Anura Kumara & M. A. K. Sriyalatha, 2018. "Indirect Regulatory Capture, Regulator and the Utility in Electricity Sector," Asian Bulletin of Energy Economics and Technology, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 4(1), pages 10-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:abeeat:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:10-21:id:723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/ABEE/article/view/723/749
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:abeeat:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:10-21:id:723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/ABEE/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/ABEE/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.