IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoh/journl/v4y2023i2p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shaping Market Perceptions: An Investigation into Macedonian Bank Stock Prices and their Drivers

Author

Listed:
  • Bojan Malchev

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics-Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia)

  • Zorica Bozhinovska-Lazarevska

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics-Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia)

Abstract

This research paper examines the effects of return on assets (ROA), earnings per share (EPS), and audit opinion as a control variable, on the stock prices of banks in North Macedonia. The primary aim of this research endeavor is to scrutinize the influence exerted by these financial metrics on the stock prices pertaining to banking institutions within the region of North Macedonia, while also endeavoring to ascertain the extent of said influence. To analyze this relationship, a linear multiple regression model is employed. Data were collected from the audited financial statements and annual reports of all 12 banks in North Macedonia over a ten-year period from 2012 to 2021. The research findings illustrate a notable statistical influence of audit opinions and earnings per share (EPS) on the stock valuations of banks within the North Macedonian context. To elucidate, the positive coefficient associated with the audit opinion variable signifies its discernible sway on stock prices. Likewise, the positive coefficient linked with the EPS variable highlights that augmented earnings per share correlate with an upswing in stock prices. However, it is important to note that when audit opinion is excluded from the model, the results change, and ROA shows a statistically significant impact on stock prices. This suggests that the inclusion of audit opinion as a control variable affects the relationship between ROA and stock prices. These findings imply that investors in the banking sector in North Macedonia consider audit opinion and EPS as crucial indicators of a bank's financial health, influencing their investment decisions. Maintaining a positive audit opinion and increasing EPS are important factors for boosting stock prices, which is valuable information for bank managers and investors. The recent changes in the audit report format, including the reporting of Key Audit Matters (KAM), have not yet been implemented in the domestic audit practice. As a result, auditors do not report on KAM, which may have influenced the research results differently. Also, the small sample size can be perceived as a limitation of the research. With only 12 banks in the Macedonian banking sector, the generalizability of the findings may be restricted. Future research could consider expanding the sample to enhance the representativeness of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Bojan Malchev & Zorica Bozhinovska-Lazarevska, 2023. "Shaping Market Perceptions: An Investigation into Macedonian Bank Stock Prices and their Drivers," Economy, Business & Development: An International Journal, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics-Skopje, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoh:journl:v:4:y:2023:i:2:p:1-15
    DOI: 0.47063/ebd.00013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/ebd/article/view/1958/1648
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/0.47063/ebd.00013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Banks; Stock price; Audit opinion; ROA; EPS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoh:journl:v:4:y:2023:i:2:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikolina Palamidovska-Sterjadovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efukimk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.