An Analysis Oforganizationalcommitmentusing Meyer And Allenâ€™S Typology: Acomparative Studyon Public And Private Sector Employees
Individuals shall commit to an organization from a reciprocity and social exchange point of view; and serve organizational purposes such as adopting extra-role behaviors, goals and targets voluntarily. Organizational commitment gains importance in the literature since it has affirmative outcomes for organizations. Although there are many classifications of organizational commitment, the Meyer and Allenâ€™s typology that was used in this research which includes; affective, continuance and normative commitments. The aim of this research was to find out possible differentiation between government and private sector employeesâ€™organizational commitment levels according to the typology of Meyer and Allenâ€™s sub-dimensions. In the light of the findings, the â€œcontinuance commitmentâ€ had appeared in a higher level in public sector while the private sector had higher levels of â€œaffectiveâ€ and â€œnormativeâ€ commitments. In addition to this, the corelation between the demographics and the organizational commitment was studied. Findings of the study show that affective and normative commitments of employees are closely related to such demografic attributes as gender,employeesâ€™institutional position and the length of service; but none of these attributes seems to be related to the continuance commitment.
Volume (Year): 7 (2007)
Issue (Month): 2 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Yunus Emre Kampusu 26470, Eskişehir|
Phone: (90) (222) 335-0580 x 2743
Fax: (90) (222) 320-1304
Web page: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/akademik/birim/genelBilgi/205/3429/1
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:7:y:2007:i:2:p:261-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Social Sciences Institute)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.