IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/jmss00/v4y2023i2id6605.html

Simulating Parametric and Nonparametric Models

Author

Listed:
  • Chigozie Kelechi Acha

    (Department of Statistics, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria)

  • Mutairu Oyewale Akintunde

    (Department of Statistics, School of Applied Sciences the Federal Polytechnic, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria)

  • Charles Iwuji Anayo

    (Department of Statistics, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to investigate the performance of the parametric bootstrap data generating processes (DGPs) methods and to compare the parametric and nonparametric bootstrap (DGPs) methods for estimating the standard error of simple linear regression (SLR) under various assessment conditions. When the performance of the parametric bootstrap method was investigated, simple linear models were employed to fit the data. With the consideration of the different bootstrap levels and sample sizes, a total of twelve parametric bootstrap models were examined. Three hypothetical and one real datasets were used as the basis to define the population distributions and the “true” SEEs. A bootstrap paper was conducted on different parametric and nonparametric bootstrap (DGPs) methods reflecting three levels for group proficiency differences, three levels of sample sizes, three test lengths and three bootstrap levels. Bias of the SLR, standard errors of the SLR, root mean square errors of the SLR, were calculated and used to evaluate and compare the bootstrap results. The main findings from this bootstrap paper were as follows: (i) The parametric bootstrap DGP models with larger bootstrap levels generally produced smaller bias likewise a larger sample size. (ii) The parametric bootstrap models with a higher bootstrap level generally yielded more accurate estimates of the standard error than the corresponding models with lower bootstrap level. (iii) The nonparametric bootstrap method generally produced less accurate estimates of the standard error than the parametric bootstrap method. However, as the sample size increased, the differences between the two bootstrap methods became smaller. When the sample size was equal to or larger than 3,000, say 10000, the differences between the nonparametric bootstrap DGP method and the parametric bootstrap DGP model that produced the smallest RMSE were very small. (4) Of all the models considered in this paper, parametric bootstrap DGP models with higher bootstrap performed better under most bootstrap conditions. (5) Aside from method effects, sample size and test length had the most impact on estimating the Simple Linear Regression.

Suggested Citation

  • Chigozie Kelechi Acha & Mutairu Oyewale Akintunde & Charles Iwuji Anayo, 2023. "Simulating Parametric and Nonparametric Models," Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development., vol. 4(2), pages 79-91, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:alk:jmss00:v:4:y:2023:i:2:id:6605
    DOI: 10.32996/jmss.2023.4.2.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jmss/article/view/6605
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jmss/article/download/6605/6113
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/jmss.2023.4.2.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jmss00:v:4:y:2023:i:2:id:6605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jmss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.