Author
Listed:
- Daniella Delali Sedegah
(Department of Sustainable Development and Policy, University of Environment & Sustainable Development, Ghana)
- Efua Esaaba Mantey
(Department of Sustainable Development and Policy, University of Environment & Sustainable Development, Ghana)
- Esther Appah
(Department of Social Work, University of Ghana)
Abstract
This paper examines the potential for Ghana to adopt menstrual leave policies by drawing lessons from Zambia’s pioneering "Mother’s Day" policy, introduced in 2015. Despite Ghana’s progressive steps toward gender equity, including the 2024 Gender Equity Act and free sanitary pad initiatives, its labour laws lack explicit provisions for menstrual health, leaving working women without mainstreamed support for menstruation-related challenges. The study highlights how menstrual pain and stigma undermine women’s productivity and workplace participation, as evidenced by the Ghana Women-Friendly Workplaces Report (2025) and research showing 96% of women report reduced stress with menstrual leave (Bhavsar, 2023). Analyzing Zambia’s policy, which grants one day of paid leave monthly without medical justification, the paper argues for Ghana to integrate similar measures into its Labour Act, aligning with SDG 5 on gender equality. Critics caution against potential discrimination, but the paper emphasizes safeguards to prevent bias, citing Olsen’s (2024) human rights framework and Ghosh’s (2024) call for holistic menstrual health policies. By addressing legal gaps, combating stigma, and leveraging Ghana’s youthful demographic dividend, menstrual leave could enhance workplace inclusivity and economic productivity. The paper concludes with actionable recommendations for legislative reform, positioning Ghana to lead in gender-responsive labour policies in Africa.
Suggested Citation
Daniella Delali Sedegah & Efua Esaaba Mantey & Esther Appah, 2025.
"Menstrual Leave in Zambia: Any lessons for Ghana?,"
Journal of Gender, Culture and Society, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 5(2), pages 01-05, July.
Handle:
RePEc:alk:jgcs00:v:5:y:2025:i:2:id:10220
DOI: 10.32996/jgcs.2025.5.2.1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jgcs00:v:5:y:2025:i:2:id:10220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jgcs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.