Author
Abstract
This article examines the complex ethical landscape surrounding artificial intelligence deployment in financial decision-making contexts, with particular focus on how these technologies reshape fundamental operations while potentially encoding historical biases. Beginning with an assessment of AI implementation in insurance fraud detection and claims processing through platforms like Salesforce Einstein, the article progresses to a critical evaluation of algorithmic bias stemming from historical data patterns that reflect societal inequities. Special attention is directed to representation disparities in training datasets, proxy discrimination through seemingly neutral variables, and the challenges posed by model opacity. The Salesforce Einstein AI platform serves as a case study illustrating both the democratization of sophisticated AI capabilities across financial institutions and the ethical frameworks developed to guide responsible implementation. The article further expands into various financial domains where algorithmic decisions directly impact individual opportunities—credit underwriting, wealth management, and insurance pricing—revealing concerning patterns of disparate outcomes across demographic groups. Finally, the article maps the evolving regulatory landscape across global jurisdictions alongside industry-led ethical initiatives, demonstrating how principles-based guidance, technical solutions like bias mitigation and explainability techniques, and comprehensive governance structures can address these challenges while preserving innovation. Throughout, the article underscores how financial institutions must balance technological advancement with ethical considerations to ensure that algorithmic systems promote fairness rather than amplify existing inequities.
Suggested Citation
Anand Raghuvanshi, 2025.
"The Ethical Dimensions of AI in Financial Decision-Making: Balancing Innovation and Equity,"
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 7(5), pages 220-227, May.
Handle:
RePEc:alk:jcsts0:v:7:y:2025:i:5:id:9786
DOI: 10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.5.28
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jcsts0:v:7:y:2025:i:5:id:9786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jcsts .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.