IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/jbms00/v7y2025i5id10833.html

Assessment the Knowledge, Attitudes, Education, Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Toward Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Shoeb Siddiki

    (MBA in Data Analytics, University of New Haven, CT, USA)

  • Rabi Sankar Mondal

    (Master of Science in Business Analytics, University of New Haven, CT, USA)

  • Md Nazmul Alam Bhuiyan

    (MBA in Data Analytics, University of New Haven, CT, USA)

  • Md. Kamruzzaman

    (MBA in Data Analytics, University of New Haven, CT, USA)

  • Sujoy Saha

    (Master of Science in Business Analytics, (University of New Haven, CT, USA)

Abstract

This mixed-methods study investigates the knowledge, attitudes, and implementation perspectives regarding artificial intelligence (AI) in education among key stakeholder groups. Quantitative surveys (n=842) and qualitative interviews (n=48) were conducted with K-12 educators, higher education faculty, educational administrators, students, and parents. Results revealed significant knowledge disparities across stakeholder groups, with higher education faculty demonstrating the highest understanding of AI (M=14.8/20) and parents the lowest (M=9.4/20). Generally positive attitudes toward AI in education were observed (M=3.56/5), though with notable variations; students exhibited the most positive attitudes (M=3.81/5), while parents and K-12 educators reported the lowest (M=3.36/5 and M=3.41/5, respectively). Implementation concerns were highest for privacy protocols (M=4.31/5) and training needs (M=4.14/5). Cluster analysis identified four distinct stakeholder profiles: Enthusiastic Adopters (23.8%), Cautious Implementers (31.5%), Skeptical Observers (18.2%), and Knowledge-Seeking Pragmatists (26.5%). Qualitative findings revealed five themes: Navigating the AI Knowledge Landscape, Balancing Promise and Peril, Resource Realities, Ethical Guardrails, and Evolving Professional Identities. Structural equation modeling demonstrated knowledge as both a direct (β=0.31) and indirect predictor (β=0.18) of implementation perspectives, with attitudes partially mediating this relationship. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions that address knowledge gaps, ethical concerns, and resource limitations while acknowledging the diverse perspectives of educational stakeholders. The study contributes to theoretical understanding of educational AI adoption by revealing complex interrelationships between knowledge, attitudes, and implementation perspectives that challenge linear models of technological integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Shoeb Siddiki & Rabi Sankar Mondal & Md Nazmul Alam Bhuiyan & Md. Kamruzzaman & Sujoy Saha, 2025. "Assessment the Knowledge, Attitudes, Education, Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Toward Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Business and Management Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 7(5), pages 106-116, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:7:y:2025:i:5:id:10833
    DOI: 10.32996/jbms.2025.7.5.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/view/10833
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/download/10833/9615
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/jbms.2025.7.5.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:7:y:2025:i:5:id:10833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.