IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/jbms00/v7y2025i3id9501.html

Retaining Values and Interchanging Values within Organizational Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa M. Bodrick

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia; MAHSA University, Malaysia; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA)

  • Mohammed I. Alassaf

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Y. Alrasi

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

  • Lobna A. Aljuffali

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah A. Alhawas

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

  • Aws A. Obaid

    (Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This literature review examines two concepts: ‘retaining values’ versus ‘interchanging values’, and their impact on organizational dynamics. Retaining values are the non-negotiable principles fundamental to individual identity, while interchanging values can be adapted for harmony and respect in diverse settings. ‘Retaining values’ can include standards such as honesty or fairness that individuals in an organization uphold at all times. ‘Interchanging values’ refer to the cultural adaptation necessary to work with people from diverse backgrounds. The concepts are assessed across three contextual situations: organizational changes and leadership transitions, international business interactions, and scenarios challenging cultural and religious norms. This review addresses the recurring importance of values clarification for individuals in complex organizational contexts, cross-cultural interactions, and potential conflicts between personal and professional value systems in today’s globalized business environment. To explore ‘retaining values’ and ‘interchanging values’ a literature review and analysis were conducted. Over 30 peer-reviewed articles from reputable scholarly databases, spanning organizational behavior, cross-cultural management, and ethical decision-making, were accessed. The analysis focused on identifying key themes, emerging concepts, theoretical frameworks, and empirical findings related to value dynamics in contexts such as organizational change, international business, as well as cultural and religious norms. This synthesis also informed the development of the proposed ‘values verification approach’. The findings show that retaining values are critical for maintaining professionals’ psychological stability and resilience, even in unfamiliar or challenging environments. Leaders who remain committed to foundational values, such as fairness, integrity, and respect, are considered more trustworthy, particularly during transitions. Similarly, managers who embody empathy, transparency, and accountability build team loyalty, especially in high-pressure environments like crisis management. Studies by Mokline and Ben Abdallah (2021) and Guillemin and Nicholas (2022) support this postulation by arguing that value retention correlates with higher employee commitment and leadership credibility. ‘Interchanging values’ are equally important as they enable cooperation and adaptability in diverse environments. The contemporary organizational environment has people from diverse backgrounds and differing cultural views. Individuals who wish to succeed in this area must, therefore, be willing to embrace different values and norms. Lipscomb (2024) and Saaida (2023) highlight how individuals who distinguish between core and peripheral values are better equipped to promote collaboration without compromising identity. For example, professionals working internationally must adapt to foreign norms yet retain essential ethical standards. The results suggest that an intentional approach to values clarification enhances personal integrity and interpersonal harmony. In other words, identifying which values are core and which are negotiable is necessary for psychological and professional satisfaction. The findings have far-reaching implications for leadership training and professional development. Change management is challenging for organizations, regardless of size and specialization. Delineating values before embarking on change can eliminate unforeseen problems and allow firms to undergo the change process successfully. Organizations can also benefit from integrating value-based assessments into hiring decisions to ensure alignment with organizational culture and global expectations. Future research should explore actionable pathways for implementing values clarification in professional settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa M. Bodrick & Mohammed I. Alassaf & Mohammed Y. Alrasi & Lobna A. Aljuffali & Abdullah A. Alhawas & Aws A. Obaid, 2025. "Retaining Values and Interchanging Values within Organizational Contexts," Journal of Business and Management Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 7(3), pages 50-58, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:7:y:2025:i:3:id:9501
    DOI: 10.32996/jbms.2025.7.3.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/view/9501
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/download/9501/8153
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/jbms.2025.7.3.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:7:y:2025:i:3:id:9501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.