Author
Abstract
This article discusses the exercise of power within organisational settings, with emphasis on dysfunctional behaviours associated with the Dark Triad — Machiavellianism, narcissism, and subclinical psychopathy — and on the deliberate retention of knowledge as a strategy of symbolic domination. It is based on the understanding that pursuing power is a legitimate human inclination, but one that, in competitive organisational contexts, can take on manipulative and harmful forms. The study draws on political philosophy and organisational psychology contributions to analyse practices such as the selective favouring of allies, the manipulation of success trajectories, and the restriction of access to knowledge as a means of self-preservation and status maintenance. It also considers the influence of Brazilian cultural elements — marked by centralised leadership styles and low levels of cooperation — which contribute to the reproduction of permissive environments that enable opportunistic profiles to thrive. The study further highlights a gap in the main strands of management theory, which, by prioritising material incentives and formal structures, tend to overlook the effects of symbolic power relations and interpersonal manipulation on organisational performance. It is argued that the absence of precise institutional mechanisms to address such behaviours reflects a lack of theoretical recognition of the problem. The article concludes that understanding knowledge retention as an instrument of domination requires a broader perspective on power dynamics and the incorporation of interdisciplinary approaches that combine ethics, organisational culture, and individual behaviour. Further empirical investigation is recommended, particularly with support from organisational psychology.
Suggested Citation
Ricardo da Costa Nunes, 2025.
"Power, the Dark Triad, and the Organisational Tragedy of the Commons: Knowledge Retention as an Instrument of Domination,"
Journal of Business and Management Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 7(2), pages 232-238, March.
Handle:
RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:7:y:2025:i:2:id:9157
DOI: 10.32996/jbms.2025.7.2.16
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:7:y:2025:i:2:id:9157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.