IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/jbms00/v6y2024i6id8188.html

Development and Empirical Validation of an Information Technology Acceptance Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Al Rian

    (Master of Business Administration in Management Information Systems, International American University, Los Angeles, California. United States)

  • Arafat Rohan

    (Master's of Business Administration in Business Analytics, International American University, Los Angeles, California. United States)

  • Areyfin Mohammed Yoshi

    (MBA in Business Analytics, International American University Los Angeles, California)

  • Tughlok Talukder

    (Master of Business Administration in Management Information Systems, International American University, Los Angeles, California, United States)

  • Md Omar Faruque

    (Master of Business Administration in Management Information Systems, International American University, Los Angeles, California, United States)

  • Saddam Nasir Chowdhury

    (Doctorate of Business Administration (DBA), International American University, Los Angeles, California. United States)

  • Md. Golam Rabbani

    (National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT), Principal)

Abstract

This paper explores the constructs affecting IT acceptance in modern organisations using theoretical frameworks such as the TAM and the UTAUT models. Realising the drawbacks of such dichotomous models for capturing the dynamics of contemporary IT enablers and use processes, the present study plans to offer and test new antecedent and moderating constructs that may provide a more accurate picture of today’s IT deployment and utilisation. The type of research in the study is the quantitative research method, which is adopted in the study where the researcher adopted a structured questionnaire to be administered to 200 participants across the different sectors of the economy, such as health, education, and business. Hypotheses of primary concern are those related to the construct of IT acceptance, including perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust, system transparency, perceived risk, and ethical concerns. The analysis of the data gathered is done using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) because of the possibility of analysing the associations between several variables. Behavioural construct analysis revealed a significant positive correlation with IT acceptance behaviours, with the value of R for the new construct being 0.935 and the R square value being 0.874, which means that newly derived constructs explain a fair percentage of IT acceptance behaviours. The findings, therefore, point out the lack of conventional frameworks in addressing the complex nature of IT use in various organisational and cultural environments. Full-spectrum system requirements in newly developing domains, such as AI, machine learning, and blockchain, require new fundamental concepts regarding user trust, system openness and ethical considerations. This work extends the IT acceptance literature by providing a better view of the determinants of IT uptake in modern organisations. In totality, the validated constructs have practical implications for organisations desirous of adopting new IT systems, particularly highlighting the role of trust and perceived risk and the need for transparency or the adoption of transparency to guarantee user satisfaction rates and consequent adoption of new IT systems. In conclusion, the study points to the need to develop new models that address today’s diverse IT contexts to inform the next generation of IT acceptance and adoption research.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Al Rian & Arafat Rohan & Areyfin Mohammed Yoshi & Tughlok Talukder & Md Omar Faruque & Saddam Nasir Chowdhury & Md. Golam Rabbani, 2024. "Development and Empirical Validation of an Information Technology Acceptance Framework," Journal of Business and Management Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 6(6), pages 36-47, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:6:y:2024:i:6:id:8188
    DOI: 10.32996/jbms.2024.6.6.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/view/8188
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/download/8188/6918
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/jbms.2024.6.6.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:6:y:2024:i:6:id:8188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.