Author
Listed:
- Rafiaa Ibrahim Al-Hamdani
(University of Mosul, College of Administration and Economic, Iraq)
- Hussain Elttayef Hamad
(University of Mosul, College of Administration and Economic, Iraq)
- Mutasim Abbas Turke
(Al-Turath University College, Business management, Iraq)
- Sura Dhaygham Hazim
(Al-Turath University College, Business management, Iraq)
Abstract
The research aims to evaluate the performance of an efficient investment portfolio according to traditional performance evaluation models and modern performance evaluation models based on negative side risks, and to know which is more accurate in evaluating the performance of investment portfolios. The research problem was represented by the possibility of inaccuracy of traditional performance evaluation measures that are based on the traditional risks of measurement asymmetry. The traditional risk profile is the standard deviation with the concept of risk, where a sample of (32) companies listed in the Iraqi Stock Exchange were selected, and based on the monthly data of these companies, an efficient investment portfolio was built during the study period, and the research concluded that modern performance evaluation measures are better than Traditional performance evaluation measures. One of the most important recommendations was to evaluate the performance of investment portfolios according to modern performance evaluation indicators that are based on downside risks instead of traditional performance evaluation indicators, as the first achieved results that are much better and more accurate than the results of traditional performance evaluation indicators.
Suggested Citation
Rafiaa Ibrahim Al-Hamdani & Hussain Elttayef Hamad & Mutasim Abbas Turke & Sura Dhaygham Hazim, 2022.
"Downside Risks as a Basis for Evaluating the Performance of the Investment Portfolio Compared to Traditional Performance Evaluation Measures: The Iraq Stock Exchange as a Model,"
Journal of Business and Management Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 4(3), pages 186-200, June.
Handle:
RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:4:y:2022:i:3:id:3988
DOI: 10.32996/jhsss.2022.4.3.18
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:4:y:2022:i:3:id:3988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.