IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alk/jbms00/v3y2021i2id1918.html

Performance Evaluation of Equity Funds: 2017-2019

Author

Listed:
  • Rivandi Uchok Imanuel Sianipar

    (Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia)

  • Bambang Mulyana

    (Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia)

  • Sri Marti Pramudena

    (Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia)

Abstract

Mutual funds are said to perform very well if they can provide a higher rate of return and minimize risk. This study aims to find out if the performance of stock mutual funds has a better performance than the market as a comparison (JCI) using sharpe and jensen methods and to find out if there is a difference in the rating of stock mutual fund performance measurement results between sharpe method and Jensen method.The analysis results using Sharpe method and Jensen method show that 30 mutual funds have a good performance where the performance value of stock mutual funds from sharpe and jensen method is above the average market value (JCI). The result of Sharpe method in 2017 shows that the best performing stock mutual fund is Batavia Stock Fund Optimal Stock Fund. In 2018 and 2019, the best performance was the Sucorivest Maxi Fund, while the result of Jensen's method in 2017, the best performing stock mutual fund was the Sucorivest Maxi Fund. In 2018, it showed the best performance, namely Trim Kapital Equity Fund. The Bahana Trailblazer Fund occupied the highest performance value in 2019. However, each equity fund will experience a change in its rating every year. For the best mutual funds in this research year.

Suggested Citation

  • Rivandi Uchok Imanuel Sianipar & Bambang Mulyana & Sri Marti Pramudena, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of Equity Funds: 2017-2019," Journal of Business and Management Studies, Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development, vol. 3(2), pages 43-54, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:3:y:2021:i:2:id:1918
    DOI: 10.32996/jbms.2021.3.2.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/view/1918
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/download/1918/1602
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32996/jbms.2021.3.2.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alk:jbms00:v:3:y:2021:i:2:id:1918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.